Last month, the justices refused the bold statement of Trump that-for as long as he served as president
-Records of him are completely immune from the needs of the state or local prosecutors.
However, the Supreme Court says that Trump can challenge subpoenas on other gardens. His attorney did so last week, arguing that the subpoena for Trump Mazars ‘ accountant company sweeps too broadly.
In the record of Vance Monday with the U.S. District Court Judge Victor Marrero, the prosecutor rebutted that debating by stating that his office sent a largely confidential statement to the judges justices last year showed that the New York Prospector was examining a broad array of issues relating to the TRUMP organization and not just the admission of former Trump personal counsel Michael Cohen that he met sex. 2016
“Claimant’s argument that the Mazars subpoena is overbroad failing for the additional reason that it is based on the fake money that the jury investigation is limited to the so-called ‘ Hush-Money ‘ payment made by Michael Cohen on behalf of the Plainbill in 2016,” Vance wrote. “This court already knows that this assertion is weakened by undisputed information in public records.”
Vance’s submission went on to note that in an opinion of the court last October, Marrero noted that the information subpoena…